Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology
Teacher adoption of artificial intelligence in autism education: A contextual UTAUT study in Saudi Arabia
Othman Alasmari 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Special Education, College of Education, Sharia, Educational and Humanitarian Research Center, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia
* Corresponding Author
Open Access Full Text (PDF)
ARTICLE INFO

Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2026 - Volume 8 Issue 3, Article No: e48577
https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202648577

Article Type: Research Article

Published Online: 25 Sep 2026

Views: 13 | Downloads: 7

ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence is receiving growing attention in autism education, but less is known about the factors associated with teachers' intention to use it and their self-reported use in Saudi Arabia. This study examined these relationships using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework. A quantitative cross-sectional online survey was completed by 400 special-education teachers in Saudi Arabia. The 25-item questionnaire measured performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, behavioral intention, and self-reported use. The measurement model and the hypothesized relationships among these constructs were examined using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The findings supported the proposed measurement structure and all five hypothesized relationships. Performance expectancy showed the strongest association with behavioral intention, while behavioral intention and facilitating conditions were positively associated with self-reported use. Overall, the findings indicate that teachers' adoption of artificial intelligence was associated with both their perceptions of the technology and the conditions supporting its use. Within this sample, teachers' intentions and self-reported use of artificial intelligence were associated with both individual perceptions and enabling school conditions. The study extends technology-adoption evidence to special-education teachers working in autism education in Saudi Arabia and highlights the importance of considering both intention and practical implementation conditions. The findings do not establish causal effects or observed classroom use.
KEYWORDS
artificial intelligence autism education special education teachers UTAUT
In-text citation: (Alasmari, 2026)
Reference: Alasmari, O. (2026). Teacher adoption of artificial intelligence in autism education: A contextual UTAUT study in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 8(3), e48577. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202648577
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Alasmari O. Teacher adoption of artificial intelligence in autism education: A contextual UTAUT study in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2026;8(3), e48577. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202648577
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Alasmari O. Teacher adoption of artificial intelligence in autism education: A contextual UTAUT study in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2026;8(3):e48577. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202648577
In-text citation: (Alasmari, 2026)
Reference: Alasmari, Othman. "Teacher adoption of artificial intelligence in autism education: A contextual UTAUT study in Saudi Arabia". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology 2026 8 no. 3 (2026): e48577. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202648577
In-text citation: (Alasmari, 2026)
Reference: Alasmari, O. (2026). Teacher adoption of artificial intelligence in autism education: A contextual UTAUT study in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 8(3), e48577. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202648577
In-text citation: (Alasmari, 2026)
Reference: Alasmari, Othman "Teacher adoption of artificial intelligence in autism education: A contextual UTAUT study in Saudi Arabia". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, vol. 8, no. 3, 2026, e48577. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202648577
REFERENCES
  • Acquah, B. Y. S., Arthur, F., Salifu, I., Quayson, E., & Nortey, S. A. (2024). Preservice teachers’ behavioural intention to use artificial intelligence in lesson planning: A dual-staged PLS-SEM-ANN approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100307
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Alhaif, A. M., Aleidi, A. I., Ali, D. A., Besheir, M. A., Diab, H. M., & Ibrahem, U. M. (2025). The reality of implementing artificial intelligence apps in the special needs classroom, a teacher’s perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 30(16), 23619–23644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13635-0
  • Alkhwaldi, A. F., Abdulmuhsin, A. A., Bhat, M. A., Khan, S. T., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2026). Harnessing AI for greener behaviour: How artificial intelligence can nudge individuals and organizations towards environmental sustainability. Journal of Systems and Information Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-05-2025-0200
  • Alnaim, M., & Al-Otaibi, G. (2025). Learning disabilities teachers’ perceptions of employing artificial intelligence applications in teaching their students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(4), 2732–2741. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i4.32888
  • Alshammari, S. H., Alkhwaldi, A. F., Alshammari, A. E. A., Alshammari, M. H., & Alrashidi, M. E. (2026). Extending the UTAUT model: The role of cognitive flexibility in AI adoption in higher education. Acta Psychologica, 263, 106363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106363
  • Alshammari, S. H., Alrashidi, M. E., Alshammari, M. H., Alshammari, A. E. A., & Alkhwaldi, A. F. (2025). Determinants of student adoption of artificial intelligence applications in higher education. Scientific Reports, 15, 35921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19851-5
  • Alsudairy, N. A., & Eltantawy, M. M. (2024). Special education teachers’ perceptions of using artificial intelligence in educating students with disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability—Diagnosis and Treatment, 12(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2024.12.02.5
  • Ateş, H., & Polat, M. (2025). Exploring adoption of humanoid robots in education: UTAUT-2 and TOE models for science teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 12765–12806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13344-8
  • Bilgin, S., & Güngören, Ö. C. (2025). A detailed examination of faculty acceptance of artificial intelligence: Insights from key variables. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(3), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202534245
  • Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2004
  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Fteiha, M., Al-Rashaida, M., & Ghazal, M. (2025). General and special education teachers’ readiness for artificial intelligence in classrooms: A structural equation modeling study of knowledge, attitudes, and practices in select UAE public and private schools. PLOS ONE, 20(9), e0331941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331941
  • Habibi, F., Sedaghatshoar, S., Attar, T., Shokoohi, M., Kiani, A., & Malek, A. N. (2025). Revolutionizing education and therapy for students with autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review of AI-driven tools, technologies, and ethical implications. AI and Ethics, 5(3), 2055–2070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00608-1
  • Hamid, M. S., Abo Hamza, E. G., Bedewy, D., Elsiddig, F. M. E., AlShammari, S. A., Bakhiet, S. F., & Mohamed, N. I. A. (2025). Impact of digital competencies and assistive technologies on learning outcomes for students with learning disabilities in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1640556. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1640556
  • Hazzan-Bishara, A., Kol, O., & Levy, S. (2025). The factors affecting teachers’ adoption of AI technologies: A unified model of external and internal determinants. Education and Information Technologies, 30(11), 15043–15069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13393-z
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hussein, E., Hussein, M., & Al-Hendawi, M. (2025). Investigation into the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in special education: A literature review. Social Sciences, 14(5), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14050288
  • Iannone, A., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Breaking barriers: The intersection of AI and assistive technology in autism care: A narrative review. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 14(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14010041
  • Kahnbach, L., Hase, A., Kuhl, P., & Lehr, D. (2024). Explaining primary school teachers’ intention to use digital learning platforms for students’ individualized practice: Comparison of the standard UTAUT and an extended model. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1353020. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1353020
  • Ke, F., Moon, J., & Sokolikj, Z. (2022). Virtual reality–based social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420945603
  • Kittinger, L., & Law, V. (2024). A systematic review of the UTAUT and UTAUT2 among K–12 educators. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.28945/5246
  • Kotsi, S., Handrinou, S., Iatraki, G., & Soulis, S. G. (2025). A review of artificial intelligence interventions for students with autism spectrum disorder. Disabilities, 5(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities5010007
  • Lampos, V., Mintz, J., & Qu, X. (2021). An artificial intelligence approach for selecting effective teacher communication strategies in autism education. npj Science of Learning, 6, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00102-x
  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
  • Li, G., Zarei, M. A., Alibakhshi, G., & Labbafi, A. (2024). Teachers and educators’ experiences and perceptions of artificial-powered interventions for autism groups. BMC Psychology, 12, 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01664-2
  • López-Costa, M., Donate-Beby, B., Cabrera-Lanzo, N., & Maina, M. F. (2025). Understanding AI adoption among secondary education teachers: A PLS-SEM approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100416
  • Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., Ros, M., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643
  • Pandya, S., Jain, S., & Verma, J. (2024). A comprehensive analysis towards exploring the promises of AI-related approaches in autism research. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 168, 107801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107801
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Duyck, W., & Duyck, P. (2011). Predicting secondary school teachers’ acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: A cross-sectional study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005
  • Rakap, S. (2024). Chatting with GPT: Enhancing individualized education program goal development for novice special education teachers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231211295
  • Rudovic, O., Lee, J., Dai, M., Schuller, B., & Picard, R. W. (2018). Personalized machine learning for robot perception of affect and engagement in autism therapy. Science Robotics, 3(19), eaao6760. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aao6760
  • Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
  • Trung, L. T. B. T., Thanh Trung, T., & Dung, T. M. (2025). ChatGPT in Vietnamese math classrooms: What are the influencing factors behind teachers’ adoption? Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202531924
  • Velli, K., & Zafiropoulos, K. (2024). Factors that affect the acceptance of educational AI tools by Greek teachers—A structural equation modelling study. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(9), 2560–2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14090169
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Villarin, S., Divino, D., Lumahang, K., Echavez, L., & Gapol, T. (2025). Digital transformation in education: Evaluating teachers’ practices and strategies to enhance access to quality learning in a local community college. Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning, 3(3), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v3i3.5593
  • Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1S), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
  • Xue, L., Ghazali, N., & Mahat, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption among teachers: A systematic review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(3), 802–824. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1191
  • Zhao, J., Li, S., & Zhang, J. (2025). Understanding teachers’ adoption of AI technologies: An empirical study from Chinese middle schools. Systems, 13(4), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13040302
  • Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Wijaya, T. T. (2022). Determinants of behavioral intention and use of interactive whiteboard by K–12 teachers in remote and rural areas. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 934423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934423
  • Zraydi, F., Opoku, M. P., Guirguis, B. M., Ndijuye, L. G., & Gyimah, E. M. (2026). Towards promoting innovation in inclusive education: Behavioural intention of teachers towards adopting AI to teach students with learning disabilities in the UAE. Smart Learning Environments, 13, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-026-00430-8
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.