Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology
Determination of safe social networking use levels of teacher candidates
Aynur Geçer 1 * , Nilgün Tosun 1
More Detail
1 Faculty of Education, Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education, Kocaeli University, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
Open Access Full Text (PDF)
ARTICLE INFO

Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2022 - Volume 4 Issue 1, pp. 1-19
https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2022175742

Article Type: Research Article

Published Online: 07 Mar 2022

Views: 1124 | Downloads: 744

ABSTRACT
Social networks are platforms that have entered our lives together with the development of web 2.0 technologies, with millions and even billions of users. In response to many positive aspects, the safe use of social networks, including some threats and risks, is an important issue for the individual, institutional and national safety. This study is to investigate the level of safe social network usage of teacher candidates and to demonstrate whether the status of using secure safe networking varies according to demographic variables. The study group consisted of teacher candidates from a state university, Faculty of Education in Turkey. The survey model was used in this study. According to the findings obtained from the analyses, half of the teachers' candidates use social network around 1-3 hours average per day. The aim of using social networks is to communicate and chat with their friends at the very beginning. The behavior of the teachers who participate in the study is the use of safe social networking behaviors at a high level.
KEYWORDS
social networking security teacher candidates safe social networking use safe social networking scale large survey
In-text citation: (Geçer & Tosun, 2022)
Reference: Geçer, A., & Tosun, N. (2022). Determination of safe social networking use levels of teacher candidates. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 4(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2022175742
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Geçer A, Tosun N. Determination of safe social networking use levels of teacher candidates. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2022;4(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2022175742
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Geçer A, Tosun N. Determination of safe social networking use levels of teacher candidates. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2022;4(1):1-19. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2022175742
In-text citation: (Geçer and Tosun, 2022)
Reference: Geçer, Aynur, and Nilgün Tosun. "Determination of safe social networking use levels of teacher candidates". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology 2022 4 no. 1 (2022): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2022175742
In-text citation: (Geçer and Tosun, 2022)
Reference: Geçer, A., and Tosun, N. (2022). Determination of safe social networking use levels of teacher candidates. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 4(1), pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2022175742
In-text citation: (Geçer and Tosun, 2022)
Reference: Geçer, Aynur et al. "Determination of safe social networking use levels of teacher candidates". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2022175742
REFERENCES
  • Akgun, O. E. & Topal, M. (2015). Information security awareness of the senior teacher students: Sakarya University sample. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 98-121.
  • Akuzum, C. & Ucar, M. B. (2015). Self-efficacy and concerns of preservice teachers towards social media use as an educational tool. Mevlana International Journal of Moral and Values Education, 2(1), 303-323.
  • Alpert, J. D. (2020). Continued education for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a phenomenological study of post high school programming [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Faculty of The University of Texas at Dallas.
  • Arıturk, M. (2015). Comparison of information awareness and information security. XVII. Academic Informatics Conference, Anatolian University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
  • Buyukozturk, Ş., Çakmak-Kılıç, E., Akgun, O. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific Research Methods]. Ankara.
  • Cabral, A. R. (2022). Ransomware attacks surge by 151% in first half of 2021 as global digital economy thrives. Retrieved from
  • https://english.sawtbeirut.com/business/ransomware-attacks-surge-by-151-in-first-half-of-2021-as-global-digital-economy-thrives/
  • Cakir, M. (2020). A qualitative research on experiences of adult individuals using social media: the case of Karaman. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Journal of the Faculty of Letters, 3(1), 91-105.
  • Cam, E. (2012). Pre-service teachers' use of Facebook for educational and general purposes and their dependencies on Facebook. (SAU: faculty of education example). [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences.
  • Carpenter, J. P. & Krutka, D. G. (2015). Social media in teacher education. In J. P. carpenter & D. G. Krutka (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education in digital age (pp. 28-54). IGI Global.
  • Carter, L. A. (2020). New teacher induction in the age of social media: a phenomenological study of teachers in their second and third year in the classroom. doctoral dissertations and projects. Retrieved from
  • https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/2363.
  • Celen, F. K., Celik, A., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2011). Children's internet use and online risks awaiting them. Academic Informatics Conference, 2-4 February 2011, Malatya, Turkey.
  • Celik, İ., Yurt, E., & Sahin, İ. (2015). A model for understanding Educational Facebook use. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 899-907. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1447a
  • Ceyhan E. B., Demiryurek E., & Kandemir B. (2015). Current security risks and prevention methods in social networks. International Journal of Information Security Engineering, 1(1), 1-10.
  • Cihan, M. & Yıldız, S. (2021). Sosyal medya aracılığı ile işlenen suçlar: facebook, twitter ve instagram örnekleri [Types of crimes that are committed through social media: Samples of facebook, twitter and instagram]. Kirikkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 135-150.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison K. (2000). Research methods in education. Routledge Falmer.
  • Cybint. (2020). 15 Alarming cyber security facts and stats. Retrieved from https://www.cybintsolutions.com/cyber-security-facts-stats/
  • Damico, N. & Krutka, D. G. (2018). Social media diaries and fasts: Educating for digital mindfulness with pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.009.
  • Erdemci, H., Elcicek, M., & Karal, H. (2017). A study on information sharing behavior of information technology teacher candidates in social networks. International Symposium of Turkish Computer and Mathematics Education-3, 17-19 May 2017, Afyon, Turkey.
  • Erdogmus, A. (2017). Analyzing the effects of information security achievements of university students on awareness: Afyon Kocatepe University sample [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.
  • Ermisoglu, D. (2016). Comparison of social security sites in terms of information security. Academia Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 40-47.
  • Garbarino, E. & Strahilevitz, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation. Journal of Business Research, 57, 768-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00363-6
  • Gasaymeh Al-Mothana, M. (2017). University students use of whatsapp and their perceptions regarding its possible integration into their education. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 17(1), 1-9.
  • Genden, S. N. (2015). Worker use of social media for informal learning in a corporate environment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Wayne State University Dissertations, Paper 1130.
  • Hoy, M.G. & Milne, G. (2010). Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10, 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2010.10722168
  • Hutchison, A. & Wang, W. (2012. Blogging within a social networking site as a form of literature response in a teacher education course. Educational Media International, 49(4), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.741197
  • Kemp, S. (2021a). Digital 2021 global overview report. Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/digital-2021.
  • Kemp, S. (2021b). Digital 2021 Turkey. Retrieved from https://dateportal.com/reports/digital-2021-turkey?rq=turkey
  • Kemp, S. (2022). Digital 2022: Global overview report. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-global-overview-report
  • Kinay, H. (2012). The relationship between high school students' cyberbullying sensitivity with risky behavior, protective behavior, exposure to crime, and perception of danger and to examine various variables [Unpublished Master's thesis]. Sakarya University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Turkey.
  • Ku, Y.C., Chen, R., & Zhang, H. (2013). Why do users continue using social networking sites? an exploratory study of members in the United States and Taiwan. Information & Management, 50, 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.011
  • Lazic, M. (2021). 39 worrying cyber crime statistics. Retrieved from https://legaljobs.io/blog/cyber-crime-statistics/
  • Lee, B. & Sin Sing, A. (2013). Social media as an informal learning platform: Case study on adult learning at SIM University, Singapore [Paper presentation]. 3rd World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership (WCLTA-2012).
  • Mozhaevaa, G., Feshchenkoa, A., & Kulikova, I. (2014). E-learning in the evaluation of students and teachers: LMS or social networks? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 127 – 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.168
  • Nitza, D. & Roman, Y. (2016). WhatsApp messaging: Achievements and success in academia. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), 255-261.
  • Nochumson, T. C. (2020). Elementary schoolteachers’ use of Twitter: exploring the implications of learning through online social media. Professional Development in Education, 46(2), 306-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1585382
  • Ohlhorst, F. (2021). Social media risks increasing in 2021. Retrieved from https://www.cybersecurityinformer.com/media/?open-article-id=15566560&article-title=social-media-risks-increasing-in-2021&blog-domain=securityboulevard.com&blog-title=security-boulevard
  • Oz, M. (2014). Changes in Use and Perception of Privacy: Exploring Facebook users' privacy concerns and awareness of privacy implications. Journal of Yasar University, 35(9), 6245-6254. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.96978
  • Patchin, J. W. & Hinduja, S. (2010). Changes in Adolescent Online Social Networking Behaviors from 2006 to 2009. Computer Human Behavior, 26(6), 1818-1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.009
  • Probasco, J. (2022). Huge surge in 2021 social media scams, says FTC. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/social-media-scams-surging-5217274
  • Rashid, A. B., Yahaya, M. F., Rahman, M. F. A., & Yunus, K. (2016). Teachers’ informal learning via social networking technology. IJET, 11(10), 76-79.
  • Sebetci, O., Topal, A., Hanayli, M. C., & Donuk, G. G. (2018). Perceptions of university students on whatsapp in educational settings. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 5(6), 63-76.
  • Sharma, A. (2021). Top 10 cyber crime trends to watch for in 2022. Retrieved from https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/technology/2021/12/29/top-10-cyber-crime-trends-to-watch-out-for-in-2022/
  • Shinde, S. (2022). Social media crime recorded 100% rise in 2021 in Pune. Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/pune-news/social-media-crime-recorded-100-rise-in-2021-in-pune-101642440822471.html
  • Stouffer, C. (2021). 115 cybersecurity statistics and trends you need to know in 2021. Retrieved from https://us.norton.com/internetsecurity-emerging-threats-cyberthreat-trends-cybersecurity-threat-review.html
  • Sturkenboom, M. E. A. (2020). Digitalisation for all of us?! - Uncovering the social imaginary of the Dutch government regarding adult digital literacy [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Utrecht University, Faculty of Humanities Theses, Holland.
  • Tejedor, S. & Pulido, C. (2012). Challenges and risks of internet use by children: how to empower minors. Comunicar, 39, 65-72.
  • The Ministry of National Education. [MoNE]. (2018). 2023 eğitim vizyonu [Education of Vision]. Retrieved from http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf
  • The Ministry of National Education. [MoNE]. (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri [General competencies of teaching profession]. Retrieved from http://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_12/11115355_YYRETMENLYK_MESLEYY_GENEL_YETERLYKLERY.pdf.
  • Topal, M. & Akgun, O. E. (2015). Examination of self-efficacy perceptions of pre-service teachers studying at the faculty of education for educational purposes: Sakarya University example. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 23(1), 343-364.
  • Tosun, N. & Gecer, A. (2022). A safe social networking scale: the study of development, validity and reliability. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 8(3), 179-200.
  • Tosun, N. (2018). Social networks as a learning and teaching environment and security in social networks. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(11), 194-208.
  • Trust, T. & Prestridge, S. (2021. The interplay of five elements of influence on educators’ PLN actions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103195
  • Trytten, B. K. (2018). Digital technology and teacher preparation: the instructional role of social media among pre-service teachers [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas.
  • Yavanoglu, U., Sagıroglu, Ş., & Colak, İ. (2012). Information security threats and taking privacy precausions in social networks. Journal of Polytechnic, 15(1), 15-27.
  • Yaylak, E. & İnan, S. (2018). Investigation of social studies teachers' opinions on the use of social media in education. TUBAD, 3(1), 1-32.
  • Yildirim, N. & Varol, A. (2013). Security in social networks: A field study in Bitlis Eren and Firat Universities. Journal of Turkey Informatics Foundation of Computer Science and Engineering, 7(7), 285-292.
  • Youn, S. & Hall, K. (2008). Gender and online privacy among teens: risk perception, privacy concerns, and protection behaviors. Cyberpsychology Behaviour, 11, 763-765. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0240
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.