Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology
Systematic literature review of inquiry-based learning models for optimizing learning outcomes at various educational levels
Muhammad Aizri Fadillah 1 * , Usmeldi Usmeldi 1 * , Lufri Lufri 1, Mawardi Mawardi 1, Festiyed Festiyed 1
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
* Corresponding Author
Open Access Full Text (PDF)
ARTICLE INFO

Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, Online First, pp. 1-16
https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202532540

Article Type: Review Article

Published Online: 16 Oct 2025

Views: 5 | Downloads: 2

ABSTRACT
This study conducts a systematic literature review to examine and analyze inquiry-based learning models across various educational contexts, aiming to identify the most effective inquiry phases for optimizing learning outcomes at different educational levels. Widely recognized for fostering critical thinking, collaboration, and problem-solving skills, inquiry-based learning models' effectiveness largely depends on how specific inquiry phases are implemented, especially across different educational stages. Using Scopus as the primary data source, we followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) guidelines to identify, screen systematically, and include studies that explicitly present inquiry phases, ultimately selecting 22 relevant articles for detailed analysis. The data collected were synthesized across four main research questions: (1) primary contributions of different inquiry-based approaches, (2) common patterns in inquiry phases, (3) the impact of varied learning objectives on the inquiry structure, and (4) differences in learning outcomes based on educational contexts and approaches. The results provide insights into optimal phase sequencing across educational levels and reveal how certain phases support achieving diverse learning objectives, from enhancing critical thinking to deepening conceptual understanding. This study offers valuable guidance for educators and policymakers in designing inquiry-based models adapted to students' needs across educational stages.
KEYWORDS
inquiry-based learning educational contexts inquiry phases systematic literature review
In-text citation: (Fadillah et al., 2025)
Reference: Fadillah, M. A., Usmeldi, U., Lufri, L., Mawardi, M., & Festiyed, F. (2025). Systematic literature review of inquiry-based learning models for optimizing learning outcomes at various educational levels. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202532540
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Fadillah MA, Usmeldi U, Lufri L, Mawardi M, Festiyed F. Systematic literature review of inquiry-based learning models for optimizing learning outcomes at various educational levels. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2025. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202532540
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Fadillah MA, Usmeldi U, Lufri L, Mawardi M, Festiyed F. Systematic literature review of inquiry-based learning models for optimizing learning outcomes at various educational levels. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2025. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202532540
In-text citation: (Fadillah et al., 2025)
Reference: Fadillah, Muhammad Aizri, Usmeldi Usmeldi, Lufri Lufri, Mawardi Mawardi, and Festiyed Festiyed. "Systematic literature review of inquiry-based learning models for optimizing learning outcomes at various educational levels". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology (2025). https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202532540
In-text citation: (Fadillah et al., 2025)
Reference: Fadillah, M. A., Usmeldi, U., Lufri, L., Mawardi, M., and Festiyed, F. (2025). Systematic literature review of inquiry-based learning models for optimizing learning outcomes at various educational levels. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202532540
In-text citation: (Fadillah et al., 2025)
Reference: Fadillah, Muhammad Aizri et al. "Systematic literature review of inquiry-based learning models for optimizing learning outcomes at various educational levels". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2025. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202532540
REFERENCES
  • Abaniel, A. (2021). Enhanced conceptual understanding, 21st century skills and learning attitudes through an open inquiry learning model in Physics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1004
  • Al Musawi, A., Asan, A., Abdelraheem, A., & Osman, M. (2012). A case of web-based inquiry learning model using learning objects. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(1), 1–9.
  • Airyalat, S. A. S., Malkawi, L. W., & Momani, S. M. (2019). Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 152, 58494. https://doi.org/10.3791/58494
  • Boateng, S. L., Penu, O. K. A., Boateng, R., Budu, J., Marfo, J. S., & Asamoah, P. (2024). Educational technologies and elementary level education – A bibliometric review of scopus indexed journal articles. Heliyon, 10(7), e28101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28101
  • Bogar, Y. (2019). Literature review on inquiry-based learning in science education. International Journal of Science and Education, 1(2), 91–118.
  • Cahaya, I. M. E., Suarni, K., Dantes, N., & Margunayasa, I. G. (2020). The effect of guided inquiry learning model on creativity and linguistic ability viewed from social interaction ability among kindergarten children of group B. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.74.421.429
  • Chandra, K., Degeng, I., Kuswandi, D., & Setyosari, P. (2020). Effect of guided inquiry learning model and social skills to the improving of students’ analysis skills in social studies learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.654975
  • Chen, Q., Chen, H.-C., & Lin, Y.-L. (2024). ChatGPT-powered inquiry-based learning model of training for intelligent car racing competition. Sensors and Materials, 36(3), 1147. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM4726
  • Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8
  • de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2024). Beyond inquiry or direct instruction: Pressing issues for designing impactful science learning opportunities. Educational Research Review, 44, 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100623
  • Fadhilah, F., & Husin, M. (2023). Student readiness on online learning in higher education: an empirical study. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16326a
  • Fadillah, M. A., Syafrijon, Siregar, F. A., & Usmeldi. (2025a). Augmented and virtual reality in computational thinking: a systematic review of their individual impacts, advantages, challenges, and future directions. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(3), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.3.3992
  • Fadillah, M. A., Syafrijon, Sulandari, Siregar, F. A., & Usmeldi. (2025b). Bibliometric mapping of data science in education: Trends, benefits, challenges, and future directions. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101600
  • Fadillah, M. A., Usmeldi, U., & Asrizal, A. (2024a). The role of ChatGPT and higher-order thinking skills as predictors of physics inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(6), 1178–1192. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.1178
  • Fadillah, M. A., Usmeldi, U., Lufri, L., Mawardi, M., & Festiyed, F. (2024b). One decade of inquiry-based learning in education: trends and hot topics. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others, 7(4), 141–152.
  • Fadillah, M. A., Usmeldi, U., Lufri, L., Mawardi, M., & Festiyed, F. (2024c). Exploring user perceptions: The impact of ChatGPT on high school students’ physics understanding and learning. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(2), 1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.013
  • Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  • Festiyed, F., Tanjung, Y. I., & Fadillah, M. A. (2024). ChatGPT in science education: a visualization analysis of trends and future directions. International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 8(3–2), 1614–1624. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.3-2.2987
  • Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Nisyah, M., Kusdiastuti, M., & Herayanti, L. (2020). Improving students’ problem-solving skills using inquiry learning model combined with advance organizer. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13427a
  • Hsiao, H.-S., Chen, J.-, Hong, J.-C., Chen, P.-H., Lu, C.-C., & Chen, S. Y. (2017). A five-stage prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model to improve students’ learning performance in science courses. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 735. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00735a
  • Khalaf, B. K. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: a systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
  • Kolkhorst, F. W., Mason, C. L., DiPasquale, D. M., Patterson, P., & Buono, M. J. (2001). An inquiry-based learning model for an exercise physiology laboratory course. Advances in Physiology Education, 25(2), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1152/advances.2001.25.2.45
  • Kolovou, M., & Kim, N. J. (2020). Effects of implementing an integrative drama-inquiry learning model in a science classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1771673
  • Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
  • Le Thi Tuyet, T., Nguyen Thi, K., Tran Duc, H., Tran Thi Giao, X., Vo Thi, N., Huynh Kim Tuong, V., Do Thi Nhu, U., & Le Thi Mai, A. (2024). STEM education in primary schools of Southeast Asian countries: An analysis of scientific publications in the Scopus database from 2000 to 2022. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2433. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14432
  • Lee, V. S. (2023). Teaching and learning through inquiry: A guidebook for institutions and instructors. Taylor & Francis.
  • Maral, M. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of global research on education in the Scopus database, 2013–2022. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2024-0039
  • Medias, F., Rosari, R., Susamto, A. A., & Ab Rahman, A. B. (2024). A bibliometric analysis on innovation in philanthropy research: a study based on Scopus database. International Journal of Innovation Science, 16(4), 748–771. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2022-0139
  • Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry‐based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
  • Mohamed Yusof, Y. H., & Mohammed, N. H. (2024). Exploring mediating effect of technology readiness between community of inquiry and student digital competence among students. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(SI21), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI21.6083
  • Mulyono, Y., Sapuadi, S., Yuliarti, Y., & Sohnui, S. (2024). A framework for building scientific literacy through an inquiry learning model using an ethnoscience approach. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(8), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.08.017
  • Novitra, F., Festiyed, F., Yohandri, Y., & Asrizal, A. (2021). Development of online-based inquiry learning model to improve 21st-century skills of physics students in senior high school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(9), em2004. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11152
  • Nurohman, S., Sunarno, W., Sarwanto, S., & Yamtinah, S. (2021). The validation of digital analysis tool-assisted real-world inquiry (Digita-RI) as a modification of the inquiry-based learning model in the digital age. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30779
  • Ong, E. T., Govindasamy, D., Swaran Singh, C. K., Ibrahim, M. N., Abdul Wahab, N., Borhan, M. T., & Tho, S. W. (2021). The 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on the learning of electricity among Malaysian students. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33415
  • Ong, E. T., Keok, B. L., Yingprayoon, J., Singh, C. K. S., Borhan, M. T., & Tho, S. W. (2020). The effect of 5E inquiry learning model on the science achievement in the learning of “magnet” among year 3 students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21330
  • Ong, E. T., Luo, X., Yuan, J., & Yingprayoon, J. (2020). The effectiveness of a professional development program on the use of stem-based 5e inquiry learning model for science teachers in China. Science Education International, 31(2), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.7
  • Panjaitan, M. B., & Siagian, A. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry based learning model to improve science process skills and scientific creativity of junior high school students. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(4), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.74.380.386
  • Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
  • Pedaste, M., Mitt, G., & Jürivete, T. (2020). What is the effect of using mobile augmented reality in k12 inquiry-based learning? Education Sciences, 10(4), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040094
  • Rasimin, Semma, A. B., Zakiyuddin, Ali, M., & Helmy, M. I. (2024). Multi-dimensional challenges in the Indonesian social science information technology-based learning: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 10(7), e28706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28706
  • Rifai, M., Masitoh, S., Bachri, B. S., Setyawan, W. H., Nurdyansyah, N., & Puspitasari, H. (2020). Using electronic design automation and guided inquiry learning model in higher engineering education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 2946–2953. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080723
  • Riza, L. S., Firdaus, D. S., Junaeti, E., Hidayat, T., Abdullah, A. G., Nandiyanto, A. B., & Abdullah, C. U. (2018). A concept and implementation of instructional interactive multimedia for deaf students based on inquiry-based learning model. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 13(7), 2016–2035.
  • Rohaeti, E., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Irwanto, I. (2020). Oriented collaborative inquiry learning model: improving students’ scientific attitudes in general chemistry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.108
  • Setiawan, B., Sunarti, T., & Astriani, D. (2016). The application of inquiry learning model to improve “satu atap” students’ learning results at SMPN 4 Singosari Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5788
  • Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: a systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148
  • Tanjung, Y. I., Festiyed, Diliarosta, S., Asrizal, Arsih, F., & Fadillah, M. A. (2025). Developing the physics learning management system (plms) to support blended learning models. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.1.2214
  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Yuliarti, Y., Suwandi, S., Andayani, A., & Sumarwati, S. (2023). Learning model inquiry-based local wisdom dilemmas stories and their effects on critical thinking and scientific writing abilities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(5), 538–557. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.27
  • Zhao, L., He, W., Liu, X., Tai, K.-H., & Hong, J.-C. (2021). Exploring the effects on fifth graders’ concept achievement and scientific epistemological beliefs: applying the prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(4), 664–676. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.664
  • Zyoud, S. H., Shakhshir, M., Abushanab, A. S., Koni, A., Shahwan, M., Jairoun, A. A., & Al-Jabi, S. W. (2023). Bibliometric mapping of the landscape and structure of nutrition and depression research: visualization analysis. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 42(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-023-00378-2
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.