Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology
Examining the effectiveness of the process-genre writing instructional framework in EAP writing course
Golebamang Galegane 1 * , Beauty Boikanyo Ntereke 1
More Detail
1 University of Botswana, Botswana
* Corresponding Author
Open Access Full Text (PDF)

Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2022 - Volume 4 Issue 2, pp. 112-130

Article Type: Research Article

Published Online: 31 Dec 2022

Views: 735 | Downloads: 538

This study reports on an intervention designed to explore the applicability of the process-genre instructional framework to teach students expository academic essay writing in an EAP writing course. The main aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the process-genre writing instructional framework to improve students’ academic essay writing skills to write coherent and well-structured expository essays. Two research instruments for data collection were employed: focus group interviews and the samples of students’ expository essays. Data were analysed thematically in order to generate new insights from the data. The results show that the process-genre instructional framework i) had a significant impact in improving students’ expository academic essay writing skills  ii) facilitated development of students social/affective strategies thus encouraging an appreciation of cooperating with peers in constructing, giving, and receiving feedback and students perceived the process genre framework as useful in developing expository academic essay writing skills. The findings of this study have implications for teaching practice in L2 EAP courses and enrich its instructional practices.
In-text citation: (Galegane & Ntereke, 2022)
Reference: Galegane, G., & Ntereke, B. B. (2022). Examining the effectiveness of the process-genre writing instructional framework in EAP writing course. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 4(2), 112-130.
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Galegane G, Ntereke BB. Examining the effectiveness of the process-genre writing instructional framework in EAP writing course. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2022;4(2), 112-130.
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Galegane G, Ntereke BB. Examining the effectiveness of the process-genre writing instructional framework in EAP writing course. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2022;4(2):112-30.
In-text citation: (Galegane and Ntereke, 2022)
Reference: Galegane, Golebamang, and Beauty Boikanyo Ntereke. "Examining the effectiveness of the process-genre writing instructional framework in EAP writing course". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology 2022 4 no. 2 (2022): 112-130.
In-text citation: (Galegane and Ntereke, 2022)
Reference: Galegane, G., and Ntereke, B. B. (2022). Examining the effectiveness of the process-genre writing instructional framework in EAP writing course. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 4(2), pp. 112-130.
In-text citation: (Galegane and Ntereke, 2022)
Reference: Galegane, Golebamang et al. "Examining the effectiveness of the process-genre writing instructional framework in EAP writing course". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, vol. 4, no. 2, 2022, pp. 112-130.
  • Akinwamide, T. K. (2012). The influence of process approach on English as second language students' performances in essay writing. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 16-29.
  • Anastasiadou, A. (2014). The impact of the application of a process writing component on the students’ writing output in English as a foreign language. In N. Lavidas, T. Alexiou, A. M. Sougari (Eds.), Major trends in theoretical and applied linguistics 3 (pp. 11-32). Sciendo Migration.
  • Applebee, A. N. (1986). The writing report card: Writing achievement in American schools. National Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service.
  • Applebee, A. N. (2013). Common Core State Standards: The promise and the peril in a national palimpsest. English Journal, 103(1), 25-33.
  • Ajmal, A., & Irfan, H. (2020). Effects of process-genre approach on writing anxiety among English academic writing learners in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 6(2), 741-752.
  • Anderson, T. (2016). Negotiating academic discourse practices, ideologies, and identities: The socialization of Chinese PhD students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
  • Arndt, V. (1987). Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing. ELT journal, 41(4), 257-267.
  • Babalola, H. A. L. (2012). Effects of process-genre based approach on the written English performance of computer science students in a Nigerian polytechnic. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(6), 1-7.
  • Bacha, N. N. (2002). Developing learners' academic writing skills in higher education: A study for educational reform. Language and Education, 16(3), 161-177.
  • Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT journal, 54(2), 153-160.
  • Belkhir, A., & Benyelles, R. (2017). Identifying EFL learners essay writing difficulties and sources: a move towards solution the case of second year EFL learners at Tlemcen University. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(6), 80-88.
  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 69-93.
  • Benko, S. L. (2012). Scaffolding: An ongoing process to support adolescent writing development. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(4), 291-300.
  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9-30.
  • Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2003). Research in education. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Botswana Government. (2015). Education and training sector strategic plan (ETSSP 2015-2020). Ministry of education and skills development.
  • Brown, H. D. (2001) Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Longman.
  • Caudery, T. (1998). Increasing students' awareness of genre through text transformation exercises: An old classroom activity revisited. TESL-EJ, 3(3), 1-14.
  • Chokwe, J. M. (2013). Factors impacting academic writing skills of English second language students. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 377-377.
  • Cirik, I., Colak, E., & Kaya, D. (2015). Constructivist learning environments: the teachers’ and students’ perspectives. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(2), 30-44.
  • Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education. Routledge.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2016). Reflections on the MMIRA the future of mixed methods task force report. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 215-219.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
  • Deng, L., Chen, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Developing Chinese EFL Learners' Generic Competence. Springer-Verlag Berlin An.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
  • Flower, L. & Hayes, J. R. (1981). 'A cognitive process theory of writing'. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-87.
  • Flowerdew, J. (1993). An educational, or process, approach to the teaching of professional genres. ELT Journal, 47(4), 305-316.
  • Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2008). Social structure and individual agency in second language learning: Evidence from three life histories. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5(4), 201-224.
  • Ghobadi, M. (2021). An investigation of EFL teachers' and learners' attitudes towards Process and Process approaches to writing. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(6), 45-61.
  • Giridharan, B., & Robson, A. (2011). Identifying gaps in academic writing of ESL students. US-China Education Review, 6, 578-587.
  • Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R.B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. Longman.
  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
  • Hedge, T. (1998). Writing: Resource book for Teachers. Oxford University Press.
  • Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Does a process-genre approach help improve students’ argumentative writing in English as a foreign language? Findings from an intervention study. Reading and writing quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 36(4), 339-364.
  • Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.
  • Hyland, K. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217-230.
  • Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148-164.
  • Hyland, K. (2006). The ‘other’ English: thoughts on EAP and academic writing. The European English Messenger, 15(2), 34-38.
  • Ivanic, R., & Lea, M.R. (2006). New contexts, new challenges: The teaching of writing in UK higher education. In Ganobcsik-Williams, L. (Ed.), Teaching Academic Writing in UK Higher Education (pp. 6-15). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jacobs, H. J. et al. (1981) Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Newbury House.
  • James, M. A. (2009). “Far” transfer of learning outcomes from an ESL writing course: Can the gap be bridged? Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 69-84.
  • Kay, H., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1998). Genre: What teachers think. ELT Journal, 52(4), 308-314.
  • Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Agamba, J. (2014). Promoting effective e-learning practices through the constructivist pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 19(4), 887-898.
  • Krause, K. L. (2001). The university essay writing experience: A pathway for academic integration during transition. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 147-168.
  • Kothari, C. R., & Garg, G. (2019). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (4th edition). New Age International Publishers.
  • Lea, M. R. & Street, B. V. (2006). The "academic literacies" model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368-377.
  • Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). Completely different worlds: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL quarterly, 31(1), 39-69.
  • Lillis, T.M. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation and desire. Routledge.
  • Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of applied linguistics, 4(1), 5-32.
  • Mcmillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Pearson.
  • Minh, H. T. (2022). Impacts of process-genre approach on EFL sophomores’ writing performance, writing self-efficacy, writing autonomy. Journal of Language and Education, 8(29), 181-195.
  • Murray, D. (1972). Teach writing as a process not product. The Leaflet, 71(3), 11-14
  • Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. TESL-EJ, 6(2), 1-20.
  • Novia, F., & Saptarina, E. (2021). Using process writing approach (PWA) to teach writing descriptive text. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 7(1), 1-9.
  • Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. Prentice Hall.
  • Palanisamy, S., & Aziz, A. A. (2021). Systematic review: challenges in teaching writing skills for upper secondary in ESL classrooms and suggestions to overcome them. Malaysian Journal of Social Science and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(4), 262-275.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage
  • Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1988). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 22-32.
  • Prodromou, L. (1995). The backwash effect: from testing to teaching. ELT journal, 49(1), 209-213.
  • Raimes, A. (1998). Teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 142-167.
  • Ramoroka, B. T. (2012). Teaching academic writing for the disciplines: how far can we be specific in an EAP writing course? English Linguistics Research, 1(2), 33-43.
  • Reid, J. (2001). Advanced EAP writing and curriculum design. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 143-160). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Richards, J. C., & Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge University Press.
  • Richards, J. C. (2002). 30 years of TEFL/TESL: A personal reflection. RELC journal, 33(2), 1-35.
  • Richardson, C. A., & Rabiee, F. (2001) ‘A Question of Access’ – an exploration of the factors influencing the health of young males aged 15–19 living in Corby and their use of health care services. Health Education Journal 60, 3–6.
  • Rogers, L. A., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 879-906.
  • Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
  • Tickle, L. (2011, April 26). The lost art of essay writing. Guardian, Education Supplement, 5.
  • Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Gauvain., & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 29-36). Freeman W. H and Company.
  • Wali, O., & Madani, A. Q. (2020). The importance of paragraph writing: an introduction. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science (IJLRHSS), 3(7), 44-50.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.